The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Reasons for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding and misunderstanding of legal principles are women who face with a singing corridor, and the defendant did not arrange the above women as a contact loan, and the defendant made a false report in bad faith by misunderstanding the fact-finding and misunderstanding of legal principles.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. In the lower court’s determination as to mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the Defendant argued to the same effect as the above facts, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① at the time of the instant case, the Defendant verified to E a total of KRW 110,00 won for singing room, KRW 50,000,000, and paid KRW 130,000 with the card, and reported to the police. The Defendant argued to the lower court that the Defendant paid KRW 130,000 for singing room, KRW 50,000, and KRW 50,000 lent to E, and KRW 130,000 for singing room, KRW 46,000, KRW 14,000, and KRW 144,000, and KRW 500,000 loaned to the Defendant’s singing room at the expense of the Defendant’s Party, and the Defendant’s assertion that 50,000,00 customers of E.

B. The Defendant’s decision on the illegality of sentencing is contrary to the recognition of the sales of alcoholic beverages, while the Defendant’s decision on the illegality of sentencing is contrary to the recognition of the fact of the sales of alcoholic beverages, while the health is not good due to the stroke of four years ago, but did not go against the denial of the arrangement of entertainment loans, and on 202, a fine of KRW 50,000,000 as a violation of the Act