logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고합352
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is “B” occupation.

On March 15, 2018, the defendant knew that he should not provide or sell harmful drugs to juveniles, but sold harmful drugs to juveniles in the amount of KRW 62,00,00, not by checking the age of "B" located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government "B" from "B" to customers. In addition, the defendant sold harmful drugs to juveniles in the amount of KRW 62,00,00, such as 3 illness and 4 illness.

2. Determination

A. The gist of the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is that the Defendant thoroughly conducted the ordinary identification card inspection, and the juvenile uses the identification card, etc., and there is no evidence to acknowledge the charge of violating the Juvenile Protection Act.

(b) Innocences guilty of the results of the jury verdict (seven jurors): Seven persons;

C. The evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant violated the Juvenile Protection Act, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of judgment is publicly announced pursuant to the main sentence of

For the above reasons, this case is judged as ordered through a participatory trial according to the defendant's wishes.

arrow