Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2014, at around 00:17, the Defendant laid off the front of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D (23 years of age) driver’s car in front of the Defendant’s driving FK5 car, and laid off the front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving, the Defendant laid down the front door of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving, and set up the front door of the alinium material ( approximately 1m in length) with a view to the dangerous object in front of the alinium.

In addition, the Defendant rejected the victim by having the victim get the victim to the car of the victim, and citing the camping net as the head of the victim's head, and by drawing up the victim's lower part of his hand, the Defendant rejected the victim by "I would like to do so in a fluent manner."

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (vehicle booms)

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order was put to a vision due to the change of the lane. It is not clear which vehicle was erroneous, and the defendant thought that the victim was her own. While the defendant was booming with the camping net, there was no particular physical conflict, and the defendant was driving with the camping net, and he was getting out of the vehicle. While the defendant was led to the confession of the facts charged (in the investigation agency, the investigative agency only tried to find the camping net as a stick, and there was no fact that the defendant was booming with the camping net because it was difficult to boom out (the statement that there was no fact that the defendant was booming with the camping screen that was submitted by the victim). The victim did not agree with the victim.