logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.09.19 2017고단787
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 18, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Eastern District Court on January 18, 2008, and on October 19, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of five million won for the same crime from the monthly support of the Chuncheon District Court on October 19, 201.

On May 12, 2017, the Defendant driven a driver’s car with B low alcohol level of 0.110% in alcohol during blood, and driven a part-time road, which is located in the Young-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, with a flow-distance flooding from the center of the flow-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance long-distance. However, even though the flow-distance boundary of the above part-distance long-distance area was damaged to repair KRW 1 million, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures to prevent any danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Written estimate;

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the summary order;

1. Articles 148, 54(1), and 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime; the choice of imprisonment for a crime under the relevant provision of the Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in light of all the following factors: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, including the fact that the defendant was committed at the time of and against his own crime; (b) the motive for the crime; (c) the circumstances before and after the crime; (d) the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment; and (e) the degree of

arrow