logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.18 2015노985
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding and misunderstanding of legal principles) is as follows: (a) the defendant, who is a male under 39 years of age, has induced the defendant to provide accommodation using the fact that the victim, a female middle student under 14 years of age, was released from the defendant's house; (b) the victim did not want sexual contact with the defendant when entering the defendant's house; (c) the defendant attempted sexual contact with the victim under two conditions in the defendant's house; (d) the defendant and the victim first attempted sexual contact with the victim; (e) the victim did not indicate that the victim did not respond to sexual contact with the defendant; (e) the victim did not appear to have expressed an active refusal to give the defendant a speech; and (e) the victim sent a pro-Japanese text message that "the victim was the victim" to friendly G; (e) it is apparent that the defendant committed sexual intercourse, indecent act or similar act by force, but the court below acquitted the defendant.

[The facts charged] around 22:00 on April 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) provided free accommodation to the Internet N.V. “D” page using 10 and 20 points in front of the mountain village in Gangseo-gu Seoul Airport; and (b) provided a notice stating that 10 and 20 points and 10 points and 10 points and 20 points are going out of the Internet, or that she sought a female in need of it; (c) provided a female juvenile E (n.e., 14 years and 14 years of age) who was a minor; (d) knew that the victim was a minor and was going to home; and (d) used it to provide accommodation at her own house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was willing to have sexual intercourse with the victim as a house.

1. On April 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on April 16, 2014, the victim’s bucks and bucks that the Defendant’s house located in the above F contains a part of the victim who reported television at the Defendant’s house; and (b) the victim’s face that he refuses to do so

arrow