Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months, and for two years, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a representative director of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E in charge of issuing private qualification certificates, and Defendant B is a general executive director and a partner of A in charge of the overall affairs of the above E.

No person shall establish, manage, and operate a private qualification in any sector related to activities prohibited by any other Act or subordinate statute, or any sector directly connected to the lives, health, safety, or national defense of the people.

around May 208, the Defendants filed an application for private qualification registration with the Korea Vocational Skills Development Institute under the Prime Minister under the name of the Prime Minister for the Korea Vocational Skills Development Institute under the name of E. However, around July 28, 2008, the Defendants received notification from the Korea Vocational Skills Development Institute that the above qualifications constitute grounds for prohibiting the establishment of private qualifications under the Framework Act on Qualifications. On July 2008, the Defendants filed an application for private qualification registration with the Korea Vocational Skills Development Institute under the name of E, and received notification from the Korea Vocational Skills Development Institute on August 27, 2008 that the establishment of private qualifications under the Framework Act on Qualifications constitutes grounds for prohibiting the establishment of private qualifications.

Defendant

B Around that time, the Korean Institute of Vocational Skills Development was in currency with F Researcher, and the term “seniors” was written to explain that the private qualification certificate entering the word constitutes a ground for prohibition of the establishment of a private qualification as above, and Defendant A also talked about it from Defendant B.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, without explaining the fact that the above qualification certificate was rejected in newspapers, living information sites, etc., issued a private qualification certificate, and the Defendants were willing to issue a private qualification certificate, and to expect that the elderly psychological counselor, elderly dementia manager, and elderly leisure manager should be denied registration as they fall under the prohibition of establishment of a private qualification and to issue a qualification certificate without applying for registration.

1. Any person who violates the Framework Act on Qualifications shall be related to any act prohibited by other Acts and subordinate statutes;