The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not allow D to perform the registration duties and duties incidental thereto in the name of the defendant using the account and seal in the name of the defendant with respect to the registration cases that he/she directly accepts to D.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts charged or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment D is in the investigative agency and the court of original instance, and as to the registration case which he directly accepts from October 2004 to February 2, 2015, D is granted from the Defendant the right to register and perform duties incidental thereto under the name of the Defendant using the account and seal in the name of the Defendant, instead of being granted from the Defendant the right to perform the registration affairs and duties incidental thereto under the name of the Defendant, and instead, D paid to the Defendant a monthly amount of KRW 1,50,000 per month under the name of the certified judicial scrivener, which used the name of the Defendant, the right to prepare and exercise the document called “a request for preservation registration fees, etc.” in the instant case using the name of the Defendant, as the non-qualified document, to the effect that D, instead of paying monthly fees, etc. to the Defendant who is a certified judicial scrivener, he may recognize its credibility in light of the following: (a) the process of dealing with all of the registration affairs, etc. on his account before and after the preparation of the above document; and (b) the statement attitude of statement

In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, including the financial transaction statement in which D, an objective material supporting this, deposited monthly fees, etc. in the name of the certified judicial scrivener, and E, etc. consistent with D’s statements, the defendant is false as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below.