A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was under detention warrant issued on March 14, 2017 by the above court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) by failing to appear at the above court while being prosecuted for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), and was assigned on November 15, 2015.

On March 21, 2017, around 02:40, the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant issued a warrant of detention to the Defendant, by the police officer affiliated with the Mapo-gu Police Station Down Police Station D, which was patroled in front of Mapo-gu Seoul, to inquire into a vehicle for the passenger carF owned by the Defendant, and verified that the Defendant was issued a warrant of detention to the Defendant, and to E to the defect E, “shots, brued, and brued as the earth for the execution

Dr. D. L.C.,

Dr. Lather, Lather, Lather, Lather;

Doing to die, “I wish to do so,” and “I am my own as the earth and to E in good faith, I am with young labor, I ambling, I ambling;

(C) Sheed up and raised;

영장을 보여 주기 전에는 가지 않을 것이다 “라고 하면서 발로 E의 무릎 부분을 차고 손톱으로 E의 손등을 할퀴고 발로 E의 무릎을 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of a warrant of detention by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (Analysis of data on images carried by cellphones);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. There is no person who has the basic area (from June to January 6) (the person who has been sentenced to special sentencing) in the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommended punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of punishment], the basic area (from June to January 6] (the person who has been sentenced to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant did not specifically explain the grounds for the issuance of detention warrant to police officers, thereby making it inappropriate to perform official

I think that the crime of this case was committed, but according to the above evidence, the defendant's arrest warrant was issued and notified of the facts and the principle of non-satisfy (the summary of the crime is also above).