logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.13 2020노1870
여신전문금융업법위반
Text

The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Even after receiving the notice of the receipt of the trial record of this case, the Defendants did not submit the grounds for appeal within 20 days from the submission deadline of the grounds for appeal (Article 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act), and the petition of appeal does not contain any statement in the grounds for appeal (the Defendant B requested the appointment of a state appointed defense counsel after the expiration of the period for submitting the grounds for appeal, and the grounds for appeal submitted by a state appointed defense counsel cannot be seen as legitimate grounds for appeal), and even after examining the records, the Defendants’ appeal pursuant to Article 361-4(1) of

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, "1. C's copy of the protocol of suspect interrogation of the police officer on the summary of evidence" of the judgment of the court below ex officio is deleted and corrected.

November 13, 2020

arrow