A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of thirty million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 278]

1. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 03:12, at the house of the Defendant located in the Gangseo-gun-gun, Gyeongwon-gun, a taxi engineer, D and the taxi fare, who was challenged by the Defendant’s 112 report and called the Defendant, committed an assault against the Defendant’s D, while the slope F belonging to the Crossing E District of the Crossing Police Station called out after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report, on his hand, acting as the Defendant when he was pushed down on two occasions the chest parts of the said F and f in drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and investigation of police officers' crimes and the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. At the time, place, and 112 of the above paragraph (1), the Defendant’s insultd the victim F and the victim G, a police official belonging to the police station E District of the Crossing Police Station, who was dispatched after being reported to the Defendant, in the hearing of the above D and the Defendant’s wife, “Chewing feass, bottle, feass, feass, and police.”

In mind, the victims were openly insultd by “I see my mind.”

[2017 Highest 77] On June 23, 2017, the Defendant driven a bicycle with a stack of 50cc of 50cc displacement without a motor device license on the road in front of the 8375 military unit near the Crossing-gun of the Crossing-gun of the Crossing-gun of the Republic of Korea, at around 08:50 on June 23, 2017

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 278]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D or F;

1. A report on the arrest of the occurrence of the case and a taxi fee receipt;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no fact that they expressed desire to police officers as stated in the crime No. 3.

However, the witness G makes a detailed statement in detail about the facts that the defendant expressed to police officers as stated in the judgment in the investigation agency and this court, and considering all the evidence mentioned above, the above facts of the crime can be fully recognized.

Witness

H was present at the latest and some of the witnesses at the time of the case.