logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.24 2014나95
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) around December 2008, the defendant delegated C with the legal advice necessary for the defense related to D investigation to the defendant, and C, after obtaining the right of representation as above from the defendant, ordered F to pay E, the cost of appointment of E, 300,000,000 won for E, and then requested the plaintiff to lend 300,000,000 won for the expenses of appointment of the defendant's attorney, and the plaintiff upon receiving the above request, delivered 30,000,000 won for 30,000,000,000 won for 30,000,000 won for loan and delayed payment for 20,000 won for 30,000,000 won for 30,000,000 won for loan and delayed payment for 30,000,000 won for 30,000,000 won for 30,000,000 won for loan.

3. In addition, at the time when F borrowed KRW 300,00,000 from the Defendant, the Plaintiff had the basic power of representation for the act of appointing the Defendant’s defense counsel and preparing the remuneration for the counsel. The Plaintiff had justifiable reason to believe that F had the right of representation for the act of borrowing KRW 300,000,000.

arrow