logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.03.23 2016고단45
강제추행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On February 23, 2015, at around 22:40 on February 23, 2015, the Defendant discovered that “D” music clubs operated by the Defendant on the first floor of the 1st underground floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C building, and that the victim E (the 23 years of age is 23) who is an employee F, talks with the Defendant. The Defendant found that the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

The term "the competent person" and the victim "h, hyman, hyman,"

The defendant's jum jums the right jum of the victim's right jum with the Defendant's jum.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. The written complaint, written statement, and written statement by the police against E of the decision-making E are inadmissible because the defendant did not consent to the admissibility of evidence, and there was no evidence that the formation was true by the legal statement of E, and that the statement or written statement was made under particularly reliable circumstances, and thus, it is not admissible.

In addition, the part of the witness G's statement that he made the statement that corresponds to the facts charged from E is also inadmissible because it is not proved that the statement of E was made under particularly reliable circumstances.

In addition, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow