logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.08 2017고단7136
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 20,00,000 won, Defendant B of 10,000,000 won, Defendant C and D of 3,00,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall arrange, solicit, induce, or compel sexual traffic in return for promising the Defendants to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits;

On January 1, 2017, Defendants are equipped with the studio 101 of the 1st floor of the Seo-gu Incheon International Building, and Defendant A, as the above entertainment shop proprietor, provided the above entertainment shop with a place by leasing the above entertainment shop, Defendant B is in charge of the overall management of entertainment shop, and Defendant B, as the manager of the above entertainment shop, takes charge of the management and accounting of entertainment room. Defendant C manages entertainment room while taking charge of entertainment room as the head of office, Defendant C is in charge of entertainment room management, and Defendant D is in charge of ice ice and entertainment as an employee to arrange sexual traffic so that many unspecified male guests can be engaged in entertainment and sexual intercourse with the above entertainment shop.

On June 16, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendants stated that “in the event that the Defendants wish to engage in the second resort (sexual intercourse), the prices including “one hour and 70,000 won, and 1.50,000 won, and the second resort (sexual intercourse), an additional 10,000 won in the room, and an additional 220,000 won at the time of mobile telecom,” from January 1, 2017 to June 16, 2017, the Defendants received 2.50,000 won per man’s entertainment, including second resort, from January 1, 2017 to 2.50,000 won per man’s entertainment, the Defendants provided the above entertainment entertainment service to the above entertainment entertainment service provider (the above entertainment service provider’s sexual intercourse).”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to engage in sexual traffic.

arrow