A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The apartment house C in the Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Bropt (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment house in this case") received an application for housing supply from December 2, 2015 to December 4, 2015 and announced on December 10, 2015. The eligibility for the application for the supply was limited to the residents of the Ulsan Metropolitan area at the time of application.

Nevertheless, the Defendant violated the restriction on residential area by having other persons apply for the sale of the apartment of this case in violation of the restriction on residential area by allowing other persons to apply for the sale of the apartment of this case and then resells the status of the winner, which led to the intent to commit an act of selling the proceeds under the name of the proceeds of the resale in order to commit an act of selling the proceeds of the resale in a manner of undermining the status of the winner. From October to November, 2015 to E, F, and G, the Defendant offered that the Defendant would make a disguised transfer and application for the sale on behalf of others, and the E, F, and G agreed to do so.

1. Joint crimes with E;

A. A. Around November 2015, violation of the Resident Registration Act: (a) delegated the Defendant to make a move-in report to a person living together with the domicile of the “Yansan-gu I apartment apartment Jho-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu; (b) the Defendant, on November 27, 2015, did not have transferred the fact at the L community Center located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., U.S. to the domicile of the pertinent domicile; (c) even though there was no fact that E had been transferred to the domicile of the pertinent domicile, the said H had the person living together with the domicile of the said domicile of the Gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported false facts in collusion with E on resident registration.

B. On November 2015, 2015, E in violation of the Housing Act provided an offer passbook and documents necessary for the application for parcelling-out, and entrusted the application for parcelling-out to a police officer. Accordingly, the Defendant prepared and received an application for housing supply of E around December 2, 2015 in lieu of the application for a household supply, and entered E’s residence as the domicile of the moving-in report on the family unit, and around that time, made a move-in report to the project proprietor of the instant apartment.