logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.03.31 2019가단125158
배당이의
Text

1. On May 1, 2019 with respect to compulsory auction cases of E real estate in this Court, Defendant B is the same as the dividend table prepared by this Court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. F was sentenced to a favorable judgment (hereinafter “instant judgment”) on July 25, 2013, that “F shall pay KRW 210,000,000 and the amount at the rate of 20% per annum from March 29, 2013 to the date of full payment” (hereinafter “instant judgment”) by filing a lawsuit against G around 2013 with this Court 3093. The instant judgment became final and conclusive on August 23, 2013.

B. According to the instant judgment, F applied for compulsory auction on September 2, 2013, where Defendant B, who is the husband of G and his husband, owns each one-half of the shares in H apartment I (hereinafter “instant real estate”) of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment I (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and decided to commence compulsory auction on September 2, 2013, but the said decision was revoked on January 2, 2014.

(c)

Defendant B filed an application for provisional attachment on February 26, 2015 for the provisional attachment of G shares with respect to the claim amounting to KRW 379,000,000 against G with respect to the guarantee claim amounting to KRW 379,00,00,000 for G shares, and the provisional attachment attachment was registered at KRW 379,000 for the same day (hereinafter “Defendant B’s provisional attachment”).

F around March 2015, the Plaintiff transferred the claim under the instant judgment to G and notified G of the transfer of the claim.

E. On March 5, 2018, the Plaintiff was granted a text of succession execution to the instant judgment. On March 13, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for compulsory auction with respect to G shares, and received a decision to commence compulsory auction (E) on March 13, 2018.

F. On April 23, 2018, Defendant B submitted an application for a demand for distribution to this court. On the same day, Defendant B filed an application for a payment order with G seeking the payment of the guaranteed bond amount, which is the preserved claim for the said provisional seizure, and on May 15, 2018, Defendant B received an order for payment (this Court Decision 2018j1899) (the payment order was finalized on April 8, 2018, “G would pay to Defendant B 379,000,000 won, and the amount at the rate of 15% per annum from the following day to the date of delivery of the payment order,” and the payment order was finalized on June 8, 2018.

G. Meanwhile, Defendant C (G’s words) is about G 327,300.

arrow