logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.05.24 2015가단82586
영업행위금지등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 18, 2002, Defendant CJ (Defendant B’s husband) on June 9, 2008, Defendant CJ on January 28, 2010, Defendant CJ on September 19, 2010, and Defendant B’s Ha on September 19, 2014, there were general restaurants with the trade name “E restaurant” (hereinafter “instant restaurant”). The instant restaurant operator changed as indicated below.

B. After the change of business operators in the table Nos. 1 as mentioned above at the time of the change of business operators and thereafter, after the change of business operators in the table Nos. 1 as mentioned above, Defendant C sold 4 of K, sn beamline, sn beam station number, heatless source number, and shocked Y, and changed the business operators listed in Nos. 2 and 2 of the J’s future list after the change in business operators listed in the table Nos. 2 and 3 of the same table, J and Defendant B received KRW 20 million in return for the transfer of facilities, equipment, etc. located in the restaurant of this case from the Plaintiff, and changed the business operators described in the table Nos. 2 and 3 of the same table. 20 million in return for the transfer of facilities, equipment, etc. located in the restaurant of this case from the Plaintiff, Defendant B received KRW 20 million in return for the transfer of the said facilities, equipment, etc.

3) At the time of the change of the business operator indicated in the title No. 4 of the same table, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with L, the owner of the building, stating that the Plaintiff leased the instant restaurant from L, on September 11, 2014, a building with a deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000, monthly rent of KRW 600,000, and the period from September 11, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

After the change of a business operator, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the change of a business operator, and the Plaintiff, four parts of the K State Number sold by Defendant C, including D State Number, D State Number, D State Number, Breck State Number, Breck State Number, Dratch State Number, Latch State Number, Latch State Number, Water Babbbs, Manybs, Ma, Ma as an employee of a restaurant while Defendant C operates the instant restaurant.

arrow