1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. On April 29, 2012, the Defendant, who runs a construction business under the trade name of “F”, concluded a contract with the Plaintiffs for the construction work of the G-based commercial building (hereinafter “instant building”) from the original State, with the construction period from May 17, 2012 to November 30, 2012, with the construction cost of KRW 419,650,00 (including value-added tax). The Defendant completed the instant construction work on November 30, 2012.

In relation to the rooftop waterproof construction in the process of the instant construction project, the Defendant performed a construction project on the design drawings for the design of the “T70 non-frest waterproof type T70 non-frest concrete in lieu of the construction.”

Since the construction of this case, water leakages occurred in the rooftop of the building of this case and the toilet sanitary pipes of the second floor, and due to this, damage was inflicted on the 1st floor retail store and the 3th floor st floor st floor finishing materials of the second floor office.

The defendant asserts that the defect items and the defect parts of the Nos. 1 and 1 are caused by water leakages in the part of the drainage hole of the third floor, and that the defect part of paragraph 2 of the Nos. 2 was caused by water supply managers due to water supply managers' failure to rent for a considerable period of time. However, the above appraiser's defect part of paragraph 1 of the No. 1 is caused by the defective construction of rooftop waterproof, and the defect of paragraph 2 of the No. 2 was appraised to be caused by the defective construction of the toilet sanitary pipeline of the second floor located in the upper part of the first floor toilet site, and there is no reasonable ground to reject the appraisal result. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is

The details of repair works are as follows: (i) the total number of buildings due to the defect repair work cost of one rooftop waterproof, i) the total number of buildings due to the defect repair work cost of the rooftop floor, and the existing design waterproof removal of the existing design of the rooftop floor (13,287,79, 2899, 2) the cost of construction for the maintenance of the rooftop, 13,287,799, 2) the difference between the construction cost and the design waterproof construction cost, 3) the brick fresh repair cost of the wall between the rooftop column, 434,136, 2) the cost of construction for the maintenance of the rooftop floor and the cost of construction for the repair of the mine.