1. The Defendants shall receive from the Plaintiff each money listed in the [Attachment d.D.] column.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s position as the party concerned. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s housing reconstruction project under which the 28,038.16m2 of Daegu-gu Nilwon as the business site (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

To promote the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”).

2) The Defendants are the owners of each of the pertinent real estate among the real estate indicated in the column for indication of “real estate under item (b)” in the attached Table, which is the real estate within the instant reconstruction project zone.

Of the Defendants, each of the pertinent real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by Defendant D and G is subject to provisional seizure and registration of the establishment of a neighboring real estate, such as the entry in the “Registration of Restriction on Rights” in the same list.

B. Authorization to establish the Plaintiff’s association and Plaintiff’s claim for sale 1) The Plaintiff is the head of Daegu Metropolitan City Dong-gu (hereinafter “Dong head of Dong-gu”) on February 1, 2016.

(2) On February 4, 2016, upon obtaining authorization to establish an association from the Plaintiff and completing the establishment registration on February 4, 2016, and around May 2016, the Plaintiff has carried out the instant reconstruction project after reporting to the head of the Dong/Dong on the amendment to the Articles of association and association under Article 16 of the Urban Improvement Act and Article 27 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act. 2) On March 25, 2016, the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the Defendants to the effect that the Plaintiff wishes to join the Plaintiff Association and participate in the instant reconstruction project within two months, pursuant to Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act and Article 48 of the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Act”).

3. The above maximum written consent was attached to one written consent to ask whether the Plaintiff Union consents to the establishment of the Plaintiff Union, one copy of the contribution estimated by each owner, such as land, and one copy of the basis for calculation. However, each of the above documents is the process and progress of the reconstruction project of this case, the outline of the design of the new building, and the cost of the rearrangement project, including the construction cost, and