A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 27, 2019, at around 02:30 on March 27, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around the police box located in B, the Defendant: (b) brought the Defendant at the police box of the Pakistan Police Station, the police box affiliated with the police box of the Pakistan Police Station, in receipt of a request for help from D, on the ground that the Defendant would not pay a taxi fee under the influence of alcohol; (c) brought the Defendant at the above taxi; (d) expressed the Defendant at the bar, who was able to be called the “spulch” to the said E

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted as above and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, D, and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The use of violence against police officers in the performance of official duties in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is very poor, but it appears that the degree of physical damage by police officers is relatively weak, contingent crimes are not likely to be committed, the fact that there is no same kind of power, the age and character and conduct of the defendant, and all of the sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as punishment as ordered.