logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.01.08 2019고단1529
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes against the victim B;

A. A. Around August 19, 2015, the Defendant, around August 19, 2015, concluded that “Around August 19, 2015, the Defendant would make a false statement to the victim at Dial branch located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, stating that “Around August 19, 2015, the Defendant would make an investment in the shares through a stock investment expert in which he/

However, the Defendant did not know of the capital investment experts and did not have any intent or ability to return the principal of two to three times the capital, even if the Defendant received an investment from the victim as above, because it did not know of the capital investment experts.

As a result, the Defendant was transferred KRW 10 million to the account in the name of the Defendant around August 19, 2015 from the victim who believed the victim by deceiving the victim.

B. Around September 27, 2015, the Defendant: “Around September 27, 2015, the Defendant, at a place where it is not known to him/her around September 27, 2015, told the victim to the effect that “The Defendant was punished by investing in stocks, but the Defendant was able to withdraw money from the bank where it should be laundry.”

However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, the defendant 1-A.

For the same reasons as stated in paragraph (1), there was no intention or ability to return the transferred investment funds, and there was no intent or ability to repay the funds even if the funds are borrowed from the victim due to bad credit standing with a large amount of debt.

Accordingly, the Defendant was delivered KRW 16.7 million from October 2015 to the victim who believed the victim, and KRW 3 million from December 16, 2015 to the victim, respectively.

2. On January 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The amount of payment of early car agreement and inheritance tax fees is required to be made” to the victim at a place where it is not known to him/her around January 2016.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed the above money from the victim, the Defendant agreed to do so.

arrow