logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.04.17 2012고단1981
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 7, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 7, 2007, and completed the execution of the sentence in the medical prison on October 21, 2008.

(1)The Defendant, as a person operating D, was in short of the business funds, had the victim F with money borrowed from the victim F who was introduced from E, due to the shortage of the business funds. From March 201, the Defendant met the victim at the above company office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, G several times, or had completed metal materials engineering doctor’s course at the HH University and graduate school located in the United States, and had 10 years work at the production department of the materials and materials in the United States. The Defendant made the CPU’s product, which is a device for planting the heat of the computer CPU, which is an ebbbbbbbb in the patent application, which is currently being manufactured at the factory inside the eb.g., currently being applied for a patent. Accordingly, it is possible to pay a lot of money because a contract was concluded to sell the products to USD 30 million per piece of money. Accordingly, the Defendant first lent the product with the funds to the product, and supplied the gas equipment to the factory up to 1500.2.5.

However, in fact, the Defendant graduated from J High School, and there was no doctor’s degree or work at a telestitu, and the above I did not have been confirmed as incomplete products. At the time, the above company was fully exempt from the rental deposit due to the lack of sales, and the above company was in a state of filing a lawsuit for the delivery of the factory from the lessee due to the unpaid rent, and even if the victim lent money and installed gas facilities, it did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount to the victim or to reduce the profit.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.

arrow