1. The defendant shall receive, on October 1, 199, the Gwangju District Court's Yeongdeungpo-gun Co., Ltd. with respect to the area of 1510.7 square meters to B.

1. According to the purport of Gap's evidence No. 1 and No. 5 (including virtual number) and all pleadings as to the cause of the plaintiff's claim, ① the plaintiff has the judgment bond No. 2006Da41296 decided May 3, 2007 (4,741,229 won and interest delay damages payment claim No. 991 decided December 9, 199) with respect to B, and ② the defendant lent 90 million won to B with "20% of the interest rate No. 1 and interest rate No. 30,000" and "No. 30,000,000 won from the date of payment of the principal and interest rate No. 20,000 won, and the defendant can, in principle, recognize that the defendant had the obligation to register the establishment of the mortgage on the land No. 2 as the secured claim No. 2 from the Seoul Central District Court Decision No. 20067, Sep. 30, 199.

The assertion that “the instant secured claim was agreed to the effect that the extinctive prescription of the instant secured claim was interrupted by the obligor’s approval. However, even if the Defendant received rice from B as claimed, the payment was made only with the evidence Nos. 2 through 5 (including the serial number).