1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Parts not more than 4, 9, 9,00 square meters.

2. The scope of liability for damages is as follows:

In addition to the following separate statements, each item of the attached Table of the calculation of the amount of damages shall be as follows, and the amount less than KRW 1 for the convenience of calculation shall be discarded:

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers) and the purport of this court as a whole, which is significant fact, rule of experience and pleading

(a) Personal information 1: The income and operating period is as indicated in the annexed sheet for calculation of the amount of damages: 2) the date of the age of 21 to the date of the deceased's age of 21 as urban daily wage (Article 18 (2) 1 of the Military Service Act) (Article 18 (2) 1 of the same Act), which the plaintiff seeks from the date of age of 60 to the date of age of 3: 1/3 of the income;

(b) Funeral expenses and sking treatment expenses (balll Plaintiff’s disbursement): 5,000,000 won): 873,740 won.

(c) Limitation of liability: 90% of liability of B (10% of the limitation of liability which is the network);

D. Consolation money: The circumstances shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the background and result of the instant accident, the deceased’s age, the relationship between the deceased and the Plaintiff, and F, shall be considered.

E. Inheritance Relation: The plaintiff and the F 1/2 to 3, 5, 5, are as follows:

Therefore, with respect to the Plaintiff KRW 374,854,50, which is the amount cited by the court of first instance among KRW 385,485,856 (i.e., KRW 195,386,11 won, KRW 190,09,745 won, and KRW 374,854,50, which is the amount cited by the court of first instance, the date of the instant accident, which is the date of the first instance judgment, deemed reasonable for the Defendant to dispute as to the existence or scope of the obligation.