The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake.

The Defendant, in the police first, led to cooperation in the investigation, such as the confession of female crime.

The above is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

However, the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and has been punished several times for the same crime.

Each amount of damage has not been recovered, except for part of the damage that has been returned to the victim.

The above is the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.