The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving vehicles C.

On October 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the C-learning car volume owned by DaD on October 18:35, 2015, and, at the time of Jeju, the front road in front of the E in front of the two roads located in E at the same City/Do, the Defendant was driving directly one-lane between the two-lanes of the Dong citizen hall at the same 4-lanes in front of the two-lane.

Since the field is a large-scale road where commercial buildings are concentrated, and pedestrian and other roads where the emergence of obstacles is anticipated, the defendant who operates the vehicle had a duty of care to check the safety of the path by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the road and prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, by negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant did not look at the victim G (V) crossing the road from the left side of the damaged vehicle driving direction to the right side, and did not see the damaged person as the upper left side of the front driver.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim, such as a scarcity of a scarke wall, which requires three weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution;

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

B. Declaration of wish not to punish the victim after the indictment of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)