logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.01.23 2017가단28150
대여금
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (CB) had 2 South and North Korea between the wife D (EE, death around March 2013) and the wife.

The defendant (FF) is the parent of the plaintiff and the network D.

B. The Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Simdong-gu G Apartment H (hereinafter “G apartment”) owned by the Plaintiff, together, resided in the G apartment from the Daegu Suwon-gu G apartment H (hereinafter “G apartment”) to September 2006.

C. On August 14, 2006, the Plaintiff sold G apartment to I for KRW 209,00,000, and completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of I on September 29, 2006. The Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Defendant purchased KRW 236,00,000 from August 21, 2006 and resided together with L apartment as the Daegu Suwon-gu J and L apartment M& (hereinafter “L apartment”) located in K, which completed the registration of ownership transfer as of September 29, 2006.

L Apartment purchase price of KRW 236,000,000 was 209,000,000,000,000 paid for sale of G Apartments from the Plaintiff and paid the Defendant’s money in total. D.

On July 2011, the Defendant sold L apartment at KRW 250,000,00 to a third party; and on August 22, 2011, upon completing the registration of transfer of ownership under N’s name, the Plaintiff, RD, and the Defendant moved back to a third place again. The network D was a branch disease around February 2012, and was hospitalized at the house where the Plaintiff and the Defendant were living together with the Defendant, and died around March 2013.

On May 2012, the Plaintiff had been a director at the same place where he had resided with the Defendant, and as of the date of the closing of the instant argument, the Plaintiff is living together with the Yong-Nam.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1, 2, 3 and 5 evidence, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's summary of the grounds for the claim is as follows.

paragraphs 1 and 2.

It asserts that the content of the claim is the selective cause of claim and claims against the defendant for the payment of KRW 150,000,000 and damages for delay under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings for the Period from the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint to the day of full payment. A.

The plaintiff on September 2006.

arrow