Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

【2015 fixed326】

1. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant stated that “the victim will work as a main subsidy from the day of the extension of the period from the day to the day,” at the D restaurant operated by the victim C on May 26, 2014.”

However, even if the defendant received money under the name of advance payment, he did not intend to work as an employee at the D cafeteria.

The Defendant received KRW 1 million from the victim on May 27, 2014, under the name of advance payment around 21:00.

2. At around 13:00 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The victim would work as an employee from the day in the city to the day in the city. If the Defendant did not engage in an urgent monetary transaction, it would cause a personal problem, and thus, the prepaid payment would be changed.”

However, even if the defendant received money under the pretext of advance payment, he did not intend to work as an employee at a G cafeteria.

The Defendant received KRW 2 million from the victim on July 1, 2014, under the pretext of advance payment, on July 1, 2014.

3. At around 16:00 on August 23, 2014, the Defendant stated that “the victim will work from the day to day as an employee from day,” and that “the victim will work as an employee from day to day,” at the J restaurant operated by the victim I, which is located in J at L. The Defendant would pay 700,000 won as the prepaid payment to day off to day as an employee.”

However, even if the defendant received money under the name of advance payment, he did not intend to work as an employee at the J-cafeteria.

On August 23, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 700,000 from the victim as a prepaid payment around 22:21.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, was provided with property.

[Judgment of the court below]

4. At around 11:00 on June 7, 2014, the Defendant reported job offer advertisements within the cafeteria called “M operated by the victim L in the K building” in the name of “M,” which was located in the K building, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would work from the day on which the 2 million won was removed in the face of the State.”

However, the defendant.