All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair form of punishment)’s sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine both the Defendant and prosecutor’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

The circumstances that the Defendant led to the instant crime are favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crime.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant's area of development activities without permission is considerably wide, and the fact that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime four times is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances that lead to the instant crime and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, occupation, etc. and the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, and the circumstances where there is no change in determining the sentence differently from the lower court’s judgment, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing are not accepted in entirety. As such, the lower court’s sentence is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.