beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From December 3, 2015, the Defendant was employed by the Dispatching Company (State) C, a human resources dispatched, and was unable to engage in normal business due to drinking, fine, etc. while serving as security guards of E (State) in Ansan-gu for about seven months, and was unable to engage in normal business due to drinking, negligence, etc., on or around June 23, 2016, the Defendant was willing to search for the said E to demand reinstatement, despite his/her normal retirement, even though he/she was unfairly dismissed.
1. On July 13, 2016, the Defendant who intrudes into a structure: 22:10 on the part of the victim, who was found in the state of exploitation in the above E;
In the city factory patrol, security guards who were on the f1st place of the F (61) were intruded through the regular door of a company with a height of 22m high, which was on the right right-hand side of the emotional, and 3m high-scale cement mortar storage tank (hereinafter referred to as the "longing day") with a diameter of 3m high, and demanded compensation for reinstatement and wage loss due to unfair dismissal, and invaded the building managed by the victim E (the state) by occupying the above storage tank for about five hours until 03:02 of the following day.
2. The Defendant: (a) demanded an interview with the head of the factory G, the head of the management division, and the head of the H at a 22-meter height of the storage tank; (b) obstructed the victim F’s lawful night-time access control and facility safety control; and (c) obstructed the victim F’s lawful and night-time access control, facility safety control, factory patrol, etc. by force, such as demanding an interview with the head of the factory G, the head of the management division, and the head of the H, to “a request compensation for the unexpected portion.”
3. The Defendant forced the victim G, who is the head of the factory, to enter the above place at the time, time, and place mentioned in the above 2.1 above, and attempted to act as if he did not get off from the storage tank and to have the victim consent to reinstatement. However, the victim did not appear to have been able to receive compensation for the unclaimed portion.