logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.12 2015나2022609
주식양수도 대금 등
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in Paragraph 2 below, and the reasoning of the court's decision is as stated in the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the same as stated in the reasoning of the court's decision of the first instance.

2. Part III, which is removed or added, the “J” in Part 3, set forth in Part 3, set forth in Part 4, 17 through 18, the “C” in Part 5, the “stock transfer contract” in Part 6, and the “loan obligation” in Part 8, set forth in Part 18, shall each be deemed the “A”, “P”, and the “Loan obligation” in Part 8.

Part 1 of the decision of the first instance court shall not be "," and the following shall be added:

When the Plaintiffs entered into the instant share transfer contract, they had the intent to enter into the said contract with the Defendant.

there is no material to deem that the intent to enter into a contract with the defendant is consistent;

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are all dismissed due to the lack of grounds, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiffs' appeals are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow