All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's punishment (1) against the defendants (2 years of the suspended sentence of imprisonment of six months, probation, confiscation, and 2 years of the suspended sentence of six months, probation, community service order of 80 hours, confiscation, and 3 years of the suspended sentence of six months, 2 years of the suspended sentence of six months, probation, and community service order of six months, 80 hours of the probation, probation, and community service order of six months) is too unreasonable

2. As in the instant case, the businesses of the illegal game room business, such as the instant case, there is a need to severely punish the relevant social harm because of the encouragement of a speculative spirit of the general public and the degradation of the desire to work, and the Defendant A operated the instant game room as the business owner of the actual game room. Defendant B, C, and C, who played an essential role in exchange arrangement or exchange necessary for the operation of such illegal game room, and Defendant B and C, who had the record of being punished for suspension of execution for the same crime, are disadvantageous.

On the other hand, comprehensively taking account of the fact that the Defendants recognized their mistakes and against themselves, the period of each of the crimes of this case by the Defendants is relatively short, and the Defendants A did not have any history of punishment for the same kind of crime, the profits of the Defendants, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the age, character and conduct of the Defendants, and other various sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable, and thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, it is dismissed in entirety under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.