logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.05.31 2012고단3455
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding] When the Defendant, as a member of a fishing village fraternity E in the South-west Sea, was entrusted to the said fishing village fraternity as a part of the village fishing village development project implemented in the South-west Navy around April 2009, the Defendant committed a breach of trust against the said fishing village fraternity by deceiving the said fishing village fraternity in collusion with the F in a manner that makes the purchase price of the fishing village fraternity up for it, thereby inducing the said fishing village fraternity to pay back the purchase price of the 21,076,000 won, which is the difference in the purchase price, and remitting the 3,000,000 won among them to F.

Since then, due to the above case, the defendant was prosecuted with F and was tried as co-defendant in the Changwon District Court case, including breach of trust, etc. with the Jinwon District Court Decision 2010Da4677, Sep. 13, 2010, F testified as a witness of the prosecution in the court of Jinwon District Court, Jinwon Branch, Law No. 101, Sept. 13, 2010 in relation to the defendant's crime, and the prosecutor asked "the witness has not received three million won from A (the defendant) on April 2009, and three million won has been distorted." The fact was that the defendant lent one million won to his wife, and the money received from the defendant was a difference that was obtained prior to the loan of 100,000 won from the above wife, and the defendant borrowed the above 100,000 won statement to the effect that he had borrowed the above 1 million won."

The Defendant appealed in the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju Branch as a matter of perjury as a result of the above perjury, and the Defendant, in the appellate trial, borrowed one million won from F’s wife G to the purport that F did not have any perjury in the said appellate trial.

arrow