Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on August 27, 2016, as an alien of the nationality of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (hereinafter “Ethiopia”), who is a national of the Republic of Ethiopia (hereinafter “Ethiopia”).
B. On September 5, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant. On January 29, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a risk of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
C. On February 19, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 14, 2018.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion has experienced various discrimination in Ethiopia with an Omomoos, and has participated three times in any demonstration opposing the political situation of Ethiopia, such as the issue where Ethiopia suffers from an Omomoos.
In addition, the plaintiff was engaged in activities after entering the Republic of Korea, and the plaintiff was written in C on the political situation of Ethiopia.
In the event that the plaintiff's activities return to Ethiopia, its home country, there is a risk of threat to life or physical freedom.
Nevertheless, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not accept the plaintiff's application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.
B. Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act is determined.