logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고단687
절도등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 1,00,000 won and for not more than 2 crimes as stated in the holding.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for fraud at the District Court for the purpose of fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 17, 2017.

1. On December 12, 2017, Defendant 2018, Defendant 687, at around 18:30, 2017, left the store of “E” operated by the victim D(61) located in Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and caused a gap in the victim’s surveillance being neglected, and the victim’s market price at KRW 560,000 was stored in the bank.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. 2018 high group 1258

A. On October 22, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the victim H (e.g., 64 years of age in the fireworks house to the extent that it is necessary to make a contribution to the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the national

However, in the absence of any specific property, the Defendant was in the situation of deducting the monthly rent from the security deposit as it is difficult to pay the interest on the fireworks and the existing debts, and thus, once again, he was trying to consume the money from the damaged party due to the interest rate on the cash, and there was no intention or ability to pay the interest or to pay the borrowed money as agreed.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and acquired cash 4,50,000 won from the victim, i.e., the victim.

B. On November 2, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would lend money in excess of the expenses to the fireworks and pay the principal to the Defendant within the Defendant’s car parked in the vicinity of the agricultural community located in Pyeongtaek-gu, Pyeongtaek-gun, Pyeongtaek-gun, the Amyeong-gun, the Amyeong-gun, to the effect that “The Defendant will lend money in excess of the expenses to the fireworks and pay the principal.

However, the defendant promises to borrow money from the injured party for the same reasons as the statement in paragraph (1).

arrow