logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.06.01 2016나110732
손해배상(자)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Defendant KRW 31,880,150, and KRW 4,04,00 to Plaintiff A.

Reasons

Basic Facts

E On October 14, 2011, around 06:16, while driving a vehicle of F (hereinafter referred to as "seaing vehicle") in front of the Daehan located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, along the two lanes from the 4-lane to the 4-distance Doma 4-lane, at the concentration level, while driving along the two lanes from the 4-lane to the Doma 4-distance. While a crosswalk where signal lights are installed, E did not find a plaintiff who was crossing the crosswalk near the crosswalk to the left-hand side from the direction of the course, and did not find the plaintiff and shock the plaintiff as the front-hand part of the seaing vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered injuries, such as the soft laverization of the left-hand laver and the laverging of lavers, etc.

The Plaintiff, as the above injury, was hospitalized at the Healthy University Hospital from October 14, 201 to January 14, 2012; from January 14, 201 to March 23, 2013; from G Hospital from March 23, 2013 to June 14, 2013; from G Hospital’s members in charge of international affairs from March 23, 2013 to 14, and from H’s members in charge of international affairs from June 14, 2013 to February 25, 2015.

The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with the purport of compensating for the damages suffered by others due to an accident that occurred while the vehicle is owned, used, or managed, and the plaintiff B is an infant of the plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 9, Gap evidence 12, Eul evidence 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the overall purport of the pleading, the occurrence of liability for damages, and the occurrence of liability for limitation of liability, signal on crosswalks, etc. are sent with pedestrian stop signal.

Even on the road, if there is a possibility that people or obstacles may always occur on the road, and if the accident points are relatively complicated, pedestrians crossing the road without permission without permission, disregarding traffic signals, and thus, if a person driving a motor vehicle is a motor vehicle, a driver of a motor vehicle who drives a motor vehicle can expect it. Therefore, a driver of a motor vehicle passing through such a place is a pedestrian traffic signal.

arrow