beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is to be disclosed to the Defendants.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. On June 27, 1967, Defendant A’s network revealed that, at the time of Jeju Island, only one part of the 1st century, which was received from the same person as a gift from the same person, was manufactured and distributed in North Korea as the Roman, and that, on the other hand, E was in possession of a obscenity’s act of North Korea and did not notify the investigative information authority.
B. Defendant B, around June 3, 1967, knew that Defendant B was in possession of the expressive materials praiseing the act of North Korea’s leader and did not notify the investigative information authority. Defendant B, on the following grounds: (a) on the one hand, he received gifts from the same person at the above E’s house, 1967, on the other hand, indicated that she was manufactured and distributed in the North Korea’s house; and (b) on the other hand, Defendant B
2. According to the records of this case, in May 1967, E received the amount of KRW 5,000 of the first place market price of the second place from Japan, the leader of the North Korean Twit Cho Jong-gun in Japan, a member of the North Korean Twit-gun in 1967, and violated the National Security Act, and around June 18, 1967, from G, a member of the North Korean Twit-gun in 1967, he received three full-time pens for propaganda which were produced in order to cite the success of the so-called so-called "Yecheon-gun," and Defendant deceased and B were indicted together with the above facts charged, and was found guilty of all the facts charged, and was sentenced to two years of imprisonment, suspension of qualifications, two years of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment, suspension of qualifications, one year of suspension of qualifications, and two years of suspension of execution.
With respect to E, a new trial was commenced in this Court No. 2015 Inventory 1, and on January 18, 2019, there was no proof of crime, a judgment of innocence was rendered on the facts charged, and it became final and conclusive around that time.
In this case, Article 5 (1) of the former Anti-Public Law (repealed on December 31, 1980) of the Health Unit and Article 5 (1) of the former Anti-Public Law (repealed on December 31, 1980) shall meet with a member or a person who received the order, knowing that it would be an interest in anti-government organizations