The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) did not look at E, etc. since there was no sular phone from E.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the first instance court: (i) the Defendant was unable to gather the mobile phone under the name of E from the sales store of E on June 25, 2012 under the name of E, and the mobile phone use contract and the mobile phone use contract; (ii) the Defendant changed the mobile phone use fee system on August 16, 2012, and changed the method of paying the automatic transfer from the Defendant’s passbook on September 13, 2012, and terminated the mobile phone use contract on September 25, 2012; (iii) the Defendant did not have to receive the mobile phone transfer from the mobile phone at the time of the above contract; and (iii) the Defendant was not subject to criminal punishment on June 25, 2012 without being subject to criminal punishment on the ground that he was not subject to criminal punishment.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.