All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) Defendant A was a spouse who was reported to the marriage with C on June 9, 2006 and B and, around September 2012, where the trade name near Gangnamnam Station is unknown; (b) around October of the same year, at the Maurel where the trade name near the said Gangnam Station cannot be known; (c) around November of the same year, at the Maurel where the trade name near the said Gangnam Station cannot be known; and (d) around December 5 of the same year, at the Maurel where the trade name near the said Gangnam-dong Islands cannot be known; and (d) Defendant B was sent one time to the said Maurel where it was known that he was a spouse; and (d) the above time and place as seen above, Defendant B conspiredd A with the said one time and place with A.

2. The above facts charged constitute an offense falling under Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the spouse files a complaint under Article 241(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, C, the complainant, following the prosecution of this case, can be acknowledged on April 4, 2013.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.