logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.08 2014가단5061312
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,076,923 on August 2, 2013 to Plaintiff B; and (b) KRW 5,076,923 on August 2, 2013 to Plaintiff A, C, D, E, and F.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact, at around 12:25 on August 2, 2013, G driven a H Hastama, while driving a Hastamba on the front side of the YYYYYYYY YYYYYYY, left the tricheon-ri road in front of the digging bridge located in Samcheon-do, 942-3, from the right side of the I driver, who passed the digging bridge to the right side of the said vehicle, and facing the front side of the said vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). As the I was transferred to K Hospital and received preservation treatment for the injury, such as a thringing of the alleys, and the respiratory difficulty was serious, I transferred to the Ynam University Hospital on August 5, 2013. Since then, I died of the pulmonary health of the Plaintiff on August 13, 2013 due to the rapid aggravation of the waste while being being treated under the opinion of the pulmonary pulmonary Elimination at the Ynam University Hospital, while being being being treated under the opinion of the pulmonary pulmonary Elimination, the pulmonary Smoking was rapidly aggravated.

Plaintiff

B is the wife of the deceased I (Last male, hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and the plaintiff A, C, D, E, and F (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) are the deceased’s children, and the defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the above vehicles driven by G.

[Evidence] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 13, 14, and 15 and the purpose of the whole pleadings

B. 1) According to the above facts, G driving the above vehicle and caused the death of the deceased. As such, the Defendant is liable for compensating the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident. 2) The Defendant asserts to the purport that there exists no causation between the instant accident and the death of the deceased, since the deceased died due to the pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Death caused by infection within the hospital.

The causal relationship in civil disputes is not a medical or natural causal relationship, but a social or legal causal relationship, and the causal relationship is not necessarily a clear proof in medical or natural science.

arrow