1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from July 14, 2011 to July 16, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 17, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Plaintiff to the punishment of 10 years of imprisonment and 15 billion won of fine due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement). On July 4, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Plaintiff to the punishment of 1 year of imprisonment and 6 months of imprisonment due to the violation of the Public Official Election Act.

On February 5, 2009, the Seoul High Court, which was the appellate court on each of the above decisions, dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the violation of the Public Official Election Act, and sentenced the plaintiff to the punishment of 7 years of imprisonment and 10 billion won of fine for the remaining crimes.

Although the plaintiff filed an appeal against the above appellate judgment, the Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal on May 28, 2009 and the above appellate judgment became final and conclusive.

B. From July 24, 2009 to July 14, 2011, the Plaintiff was confined to Seoul Southern Prison, and thereafter, is under confinement in the astronomical Prison.

C. From March 10, 201 to July 14, 2011, the head of the Seoul Southern Prison (hereinafter “Seoul Southern Prison”) designated the Plaintiff as a person subject to a correctional officer’s participation in meetings, thereby having a correctional officer participate in the Plaintiff’s meetings with a third party; listening to, recording, recording, and video recording of the details of meetings; and on March 10, 2010, the list of prisoners subject to a correctional officer’s participation in meetings (Article 142(1)4-2) prepared by the head of the Seoul Southern Prison (Article 142(1).

On May 24, 2010, the head of Seoul Southern Correctional Institution designated the plaintiff as a subject of correspondence censorship on the ground that the correctional officer meeting (No. 25) of the Seoul Southern Prison on May 24, 2010 designated the plaintiff as a subject of correspondence censorship on the ground that the plaintiff is a social criminal [the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement)]. On February 1, 2011, the prison officer meeting of the correctional officer (No. 24) designated the plaintiff as a subject of correspondence censorship on the ground that the plaintiff

Then, the Plaintiff’s correspondence exchanged with others was censorship.