Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense, part of the facts charged was legally adopted and investigated by this court.

From November 2014, the Defendant had been working as a telecomter in the planning real estate industry, and had the victim F F, who became aware of through the introduction of land E, sell part of the above D forest, upon request from C, a real estate company, a planning real estate business entity, to attract customers about Gangwon-si forest and fields.

The Defendant, around 18:00 on June 2, 2015, around H Station located in Gwanak-gu in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would sell the Defendant’s land to the Plaintiff for KRW 165 square meters and KRW 20 million out of the Gangwon-si J forest in Gangwon-do. However, the Defendant would have the Defendant purchase the forest land from the said company if it is the State.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact was that the Defendant agreed to trade the above forest land of KRW 165 square meters from the above corporation C, and the KRW 10 million out of the purchase price paid from the injured party was a plan for the Defendant to purchase the above forest land of KRW 299 square meters from the above corporation and to use them for the payment of part of the purchase price.

The Defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred 20 million won to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant around the 9th of the same month from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant on the 165 square meters of the above forest. However, the Defendant paid 10 million won to the said stock company C with the purchase price on the 165 square meters of the above forest land, and paid 10 million won to the remaining 165 square meters of the purchase price, as above, as part of the above 299 square meters of the forest land purchased by the Defendant from C.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to acquire the difference of 10 million won by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;