A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 3011"

1. Around 10:00 on March 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of KRW 220,000 in cash owned by the victim D, which was left on the back of the depository, while serving as an employee in the E-gu area operated by the victim D on the second floor of the building C in Gyeyang-si, Yangsan-si.

2. On July 1, 2013, around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) went back from the head of the above E-gu E-gu, the Defendant: (b) 70,000 won in cash owned by the victim D, left the victim D and F on his/her bank, and went back to the head of the E-gu, where he/she met the friendship F, working as an employee; and (c) was negligent in the supervision of the victim D and F.

3. Around 05:00 on July 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) went back from the above E-gu head of the party branch; (b) 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim D, left his/her friendly F, who works as an employee; and (c) went back to the victim’s and F’s supervision over his/her crepits; and (d) subsequently, 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim and F.

4. On August 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of KRW 730,000,000 in cash owned by the victim F, which had been kept in a box in the margin of the victim F, located in the house of the G building 201, the G building 201, the Defendant, at the house of the victim F, brought about a theft of KRW 730,00 in cash owned by the victim F.

"2013 Highest 3789" Defendant is an employee of the title "I" operated by H.

On July 28, 2013, around 21:30 on July 28, 2013, the Defendant, within the main point of “I” located in Yangsan-si J, Yangsan-si, wherein he works, drinked the alcohol by the victim K (Nam and 22 years of age) who is a customer, and had one LG smartphone in an amount equivalent to one million won at the market price on the table on the table, and had the Defendant stolen it.

The defendant immediately moved the above mobile phone to a place where the victim left the above table, as the victim left the above table, and then ask the victim to find a mobile phone again and then whether the victim has a permanent domicile as the main point, and then the victim makes a false statement that "no one had on the table" to the reporter, and that the victim's crepits the victim again using the gap.