logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.09 2016고합355
준강도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Quasi-Robbery;

A. On June 28, 2015, the Defendant, who committed the crime of June 28, 2015, was under the influence of alcohol in front of D pharmacies located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on June 28, 2015, was the Defendant’s hand, and the victim, who was under the influence of the victim E, was trying to cut off the wall containing five head of the physical card, by inserting his hand, to cut off the wall on the back of the victim E.

“In order to escape arrest,” the victim’s face was boomed by drinking and unbrupting the victim’s face.

B. On June 26, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime on June 26, 2016, up to 01:40 on June 26, 2016, up to 6,000 won and resident registration certificates of the victim, and one half of the half of the half of which contain three copies of Korean credit cards, etc., where the victim G was under the influence of alcohol at the front of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Fro, with the victim G who was in a taxi and was under the influence of alcohol.

In order to evade the arrest of the victim who found it, the victim was assaulted by taking the victim's face into drinking.

2. On February 2, 2016, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in which the victim J was set up a locking place for the transport of goods in front of the I convenience store in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) opened a door in which the victim J did not correct K Poter freight cars owned by the victim J; and (c) cut off 300,000,000 won of the market value of the victim who was in the said cargo driver’s seat, when Samsung G Dop Dop, which was the victim’s possession of the said cargo driver’s seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written Statement;

1. Damage photographs, records of seizure (voluntary submission), photographs of seized objects, CCTV-recording images, field photographs, and CCTV video CDs;

1. Each investigation report (CCTV image analysis) (Verification of a suspect's escape) (applicable to the Acts and subordinate statutes related to the victim and the surrounding CCTV in the vicinity);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 335 and 333 of the Criminal Act (a quasi-Robbery) regarding criminal facts, and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (abstinence and choice of imprisonment).

arrow