logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2017.06.15 2017고단110
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On May 23, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving) in the Cheongju District Court's Support on December 6, 2007. On August 6, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving), and on August 31, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving) in the Cheongju District Court's Support.

[Criminal facts]

1. Although Defendant 1 had been punished twice or more for violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), Defendant 2 driven C 2 truck under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.161% in the section of about 40km from the 40km of alcohol leveling from the 3rd-way road on March 27, 2017 to the front side of the Young-gu Office of Youngwon located as of the same hour in the same city, via the 3rd-way road on March 27, 2017 at the same time, at the same time, from the 13:54 at the 3rd-way road on March 27, 2017.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the second cargo vehicle of CPoter.

When driving the above vehicle at the same time and driving the above vehicle at the direction of the road near the border intersection in the south of the river, the defendant, despite the occupational duty to safely drive the front side and the left side, and prevent the accident in advance by safely operating the steering gear and brakes, the defendant, while neglecting the alcohol level of 0.161% while under the influence of alcohol level during blood, failed to stop the PE protective wall installed in the middle of the road to be scattered on the road, and failed to immediately stop the PE protective wall installed in the front side of the vehicle of the defendant, but failed to take necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Facts】

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident;

arrow