1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 20, 2015, the Plaintiff was an employee of Ethal Information and Communications Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) and was diagnosed with the “influent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent fluent flu

B. Although the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the instant injury or disease occurred on July 30, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision not to approve the Plaintiff’s application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) according to the deliberation of the Occupational Disease Review Committee, based on the following: (a) even though the applicant’s injury or disease was recognized as having low business contribution to the occurrence of the injury or disease; and (b) the detailed collection of emerculation is a merger certificate that occurred during the treatment of brain color, and thus, there is no proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s business branch and the Plaintiff’s business.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. In full view of the following, the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion: (a) the Plaintiff had been unable to engage in not only the business of installing and repairing the Internet, but also the business of attracting subscription to new services in the company; (b) the Plaintiff’s average business hours during 12 weeks prior to the occurrence; (c) the Plaintiff was under severe stress due to pressure on the Nonparty company’s allowance policy; and (d) the Plaintiff had no record of treatment for brain-related diseases before the instant case; and (c) there was no history of treatment due to brain-related diseases, a proximate causal link is recognized between the instant shopping branch and the Plaintiff’s business.

Therefore, it is true.