1. The Plaintiff’s damage liability against the Defendant does not exist with respect to the accident described in the attached list.

Basic Facts

As follows, around 15:00 on March 1, 2016, the Plaintiff driven a C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and waiting for signal at the front side of the E-ray located in Osan-si D, and making a left turn, pursuant to the signals to the left, passed the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle while driving the vehicle at the front side of the E-ray located in Osan-si D, and the Defendant (76 years of age) entering the crosswalk from the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving along the bicycle to the crosswalk, and met the front side of the Plaintiff’s bicycle.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident.” The Defendant suffered from the left-hand alley of the instant accident, and paid the sum of KRW 6,455,536 to the medical expenses.

[Ground of appeal] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 3-1, 2, 3, 8, Eul evidence 2-5 (including a branch number), Gap evidence 3-4-7, Gap evidence 3-9-3-21, and the summary of the plaintiff's argument of the purport of the whole arguments, the plaintiff's bicycle could not be expected to have a chief side of the plaintiff's bicycle appearing behind the plaintiff's own vehicle, so there was no negligence on the plaintiff.

The point of the accident of this case by the defendant is a place where people have a lot of traffic, there is no pedestrian signal, etc. on the crosswalk, and when the plaintiff's vehicle starts to turn to the left, the defendant's bicycle was left on the front side of the marith, and therefore, the plaintiff

In light of the circumstances described below, there is no negligence in the accident of this case to the Plaintiff and there is no proximate causal relation between the negligence and the accident of this case.

Plaintiff

The vehicle started to turn to the left in 15:04:51 according to the new subparagraph, and approximately 2 seconds from the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle to approximately 2 meters from the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle, the bicycle front wheel of the defendant's bicycle at a point of 2 meters [the statement in A No. 3-1, the black box of the plaintiff's vehicle, which was submitted on February 2, 2016, were reproduced at the court on the second date for pleading.

[Video] Plaintiff ..