The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2 million won in punishment, and 40 hours in order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable circumstance that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the defendant agreed with the victim only smoothly, and that there is no previous conviction in the same kind of crime.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the victim's bucks, etc. which were seated adjacent to the subway, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the court below appears to have taken into account the favorable circumstances of the defendant, and there are no changes in circumstances that may be reflected in the sentencing in the court of the case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and changes theory, such as the circumstances after the crime, are considered to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.