The defendant and prosecutor's appeal against the first and second original judgment are all dismissed.

1. Whether the first and second original judgments are reversed in accordance with the consolidated proceedings (negative), the arguments in each appeal case against the first and second original judgments were combined, but the first and second original judgments were sentenced to imprisonment, and the second and the second original judgments were sentenced to a fine, respectively. In case where the types of the judgments rendered by each appellate court are different, the appellate court, even if the arguments are combined, may maintain the concurrent sentence if each of the appellate courts determines that the sentence of the first and the second original judgments is appropriate and that the sentence of the first and the second original judgments is appropriate, and it does not necessarily have to be sentenced to a single sentence of the same kind. Thus, the first and second original judgments are not reversed ex officio on the sole ground of the consolidation itself, and the defendant and the prosecutor's appeal against

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

(a) Original judgment of the first instance: Imprisonment with prison labor for four months;

(b) Original judgment of the second instance: Each unfair sentencing (two million won of a fine)

3. Determination

A. We examine the judgment of the court of first instance on the assertion of unfair sentencing on each of the allegation of unfair sentencing on the judgment of the court of first instance. There are unfavorable circumstances, such as: (a) the defrauded amount of each of the crimes of this case is equivalent to approximately 12 million won; (b) the victims of each of the crimes of fraud by using computers, etc. were not agreed upon; and (c) the Defendant repeatedly committed each of the crimes

On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of each of the crimes in this case and reflection, the agreement between the victims of fraud and the victims of fraud, and the absence of records of crimes exceeding fines.

In full view of the various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the above circumstances, such as character, conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the first instance court’s sentence is deemed appropriate within the scope of discretion.

Therefore, both the defendant and prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is rejected.

B. We examine the judgment of the court of the second instance on the assertion of unfair sentencing, and the crime of this case is false on the Internet.