1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiffs filed a claim against the Defendant on June 26, 2014 regarding each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet against the co-defendants of the first instance trial, claiming that the Defendant make a claim for the registration of ownership transfer by subrogation of the co-defendants of the first instance trial as the preserved right.

The court of first instance has accepted all the claims against the defendant and co-defendants of the first instance court, and only the defendant appealed against this, so only the claim against the defendant is subject to the judgment of this court.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is to be deleted from Articles 9 to 10, 9, and 8 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to be stated, except for the addition of the judgment of the defendant to the grounds of appeal as stated in paragraph (3). Thus, this is to be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence

(However, as examined in the preceding paragraph, the part concerning the claim against the co-defendant of the first instance court that does not fall within the scope of the trial in this Court is excluded).

A. According to Article 17(6) of the instant business agreement, “The co-defendants of the first instance trial in relation to the instant business shall obtain prior consent from the relevant parties if they use the pilot, the name and route of the Defendant, and the financial institution with respect to all advertising activities, such as the production of promotional materials and the content of the advertisement.” Considering that the instant advertising (No. 4 provides that the Defendant’s trade name and route are indicated in the certificate No. 4, the co-defendants of the first instance trial and the parties to the instant business agreement, including the Defendant, to sell in lots the advertising price in the instant case.”

In addition, according to Article 25 (4) of the business agreement of this case, the loan financial institutions and the city corporation's bonds are secured for the unsold goods.