logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 05. 12. 선고 2017다208225 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) The defendant collected the claim of this case after seizing it upon the plaintiff's default of payment, and it is difficult to recognize illegality of the collection procedure.

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The ground of appeal was examined in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment below, but the ground of appeal was examined.

The argument does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal

It is judged that it cannot be accepted.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow